My apologies if it appears bareboned
I am not displeased that it is so bare-bone. In fact i am happy that i can add whatever i choose.
I have seen live-update and have also seen various packages that i can download/add.
After creating this thread, i observed that there are already old threads discussing linpus.
as you are connected with linpus, may i ask when there is no difference in installed packages either in windows installation (386MB) & or in dvd download/installation ( 861MB), why difference in size? Is it due to different style of install? I mean direct install require so much extra ?
Pl forgive me if i am not clear?
further whether gnome-3-shell is available & will work in linpus?
---------- Post added at 11:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:06 AM ----------
At that time, it was based upon Fedora 8--one example that I remember is that loading the module for the wireless card was tied into the xinit scripts somewhere.
hy, smr54, i have learned from reading comments of few learned active people and you are one of them.
I think there may be some trueness to this statement till date. In virtualbox (dualboot windows7 & linpus installed via windows installer), in linpus, network stopped working without any indication. (It may be due to virtualbox/my network problem.) I simply reinstalled & it started working again.
i read past comments. Now the distro is different. If linpus people can add such wubi type windows installer, why in fedora it is not there? Policy decision?
Will such installtion not increase popularity of fedora or fedora people fear increased popularity?