Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
  #46  
Old 30th August 2011, 07:27 PM
steelaworkn's Avatar
steelaworkn Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest
Age: 46
Posts: 1,090
linuxfirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

I won't be an Alpha or Beta tester, but I learn a lot from these discussions. I'm waiting to install 16 on Thanksgiving weekend. Kind of a tradition for the last few years. But keep up the good work.
__________________
My setup:

Intel DP35DP MB; Nvidia 440 2 gig Video Card; 8 gigs of ram; Intel Core Duo 2.20 gig; Hp Officejet Pro L7580; LVM F18 64bit using 3 320g HDs and a nice LG 22 in. Monitor.
  #47  
Old 30th August 2011, 07:31 PM
hamdanim Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1
windows_7firefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

What are the programs supported by fedora16
thanks
  #48  
Old 31st August 2011, 03:55 AM
downer Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 72
linuxfirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

Is it normal that the install from a live DVD can't make the root partition as btrfs and only the home partion can be made btrfs? The install disk kept complaining since the install media used ext3, that the root partition can also only be ext3. I tried formatting the entire hard drive as btrfs, but that didn't help. I know btrfs is still experimental and maybe still has no disk check.
  #49  
Old 31st August 2011, 04:28 AM
tox
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
linuxfirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by hamdanim View Post
What are the programs supported by fedora16
thanks
what do you mean as in " programs supported by F16 ? can you be a bit more pacific
  #50  
Old 31st August 2011, 05:39 AM
sonoran's Avatar
sonoran Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sonoran Desert
Posts: 2,099
linuxfirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by steelaworkn View Post
I'm waiting to install 16 on Thanksgiving weekend.
There's an easy turkey joke here, but I don't want to jinx F16. Hoping for the best.
  #51  
Old 31st August 2011, 07:31 PM
AdamW's Avatar
AdamW Online
Fedora QA Community Monkey
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,761
linuxfirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

downer: yes, it's normal. The live installer works by dumping a partition image onto the hard disk, basically: it doesn't format a partition then install packages to it one by one. That's the reason for the restriction.
__________________
Adam Williamson | awilliam AT redhat DOT com
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
  #52  
Old 1st September 2011, 02:53 PM
downer Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 72
linuxfirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamW View Post
downer: yes, it's normal. The live installer works by dumping a partition image onto the hard disk, basically: it doesn't format a partition then install packages to it one by one. That's the reason for the restriction.
Thanks, never tried formatting from a live image before and never seen format options for live images.
  #53  
Old 1st September 2011, 06:06 PM
martyfelker Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Floyd, VA
Posts: 80
linuxchrome
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

The only reason I used the live installer is that it was the only ISO that booted (and yes I tried to burn several std ISO and checked them). While it does copy the image anaconda does offer to select the / and /boot partitions - else somebody would wipe their Windows partition and might not be happy. If I selected to change the location of the boot loader to a partition rather than the MBR Ananconda didn't complain but the install failed as the install bootloader step. . Hence I had no choice. I'll see if the recently realized TC! Alpha will boot - however I'm not in a rush as I've completely updated Alpha RC! to the current distribution release and its working great along with a multboot configuration. My machine is strictly experimental so if something fails I'll just wipe it (keeping the Logical Volumes) and re install.
 

Tags
alpha, discussion, fedora, thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
vendor discussion -- split from another thread. Dan Wibble 8 21st March 2010 10:03 AM
Secondary bulldozer thread discussion Dan Wibble 18 26th February 2010 08:00 PM
The Z softs discussion thread spacefrog Security and Privacy 0 16th August 2009 01:43 AM


Current GMT-time: 22:24 (Sunday, 19-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat