Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
  #1  
Old 27th June 2010, 02:41 AM
Thor357 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 9
windows_xp_2003firefox
IBM e-server 255 Fedora install?

I have a couple Ibm E-servers (255) with Windows 2K installed. I want to install some kind of Linux server package and Fedora is my first choice. These have dual 2.4 gig Xeon processors, and 4 gig's of ram. I have 6 of the pull out drives at 82 gig each (Raid SCSI).

Any suggestions?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27th June 2010, 03:12 AM
jpollard Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waldorf, Maryland
Posts: 6,104
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: IBM e-server 255 Fedora install?

Nope. You haven't exactly said what you want to do with them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27th June 2010, 04:34 AM
Thor357 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 9
windows_xp_2003firefox
Re: IBM e-server 255 Fedora install?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpollard View Post
Nope. You haven't exactly said what you want to do with them.

Well I want to use them here at home one as a file server/raid.

The other as a stand alone server or team speak and a couple of other apps.

Nothing too sophisticated.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27th June 2010, 06:07 AM
CSchwangler Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,535
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: IBM e-server 255 Fedora install?

You probably know that Fedora might not be the right choice as a server OS because of short release cycles, many updates during the lifecycle, and it sometimes breaks. Have you considered distributions that are more stable, e.g. Debian, Scientific or CentOS (both RHEL based)?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27th June 2010, 06:53 AM
Thor357 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 9
windows_xp_2003firefox
Re: IBM e-server 255 Fedora install?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSchwangler View Post
You probably know that Fedora might not be the right choice as a server OS because of short release cycles, many updates during the lifecycle, and it sometimes breaks. Have you considered distributions that are more stable, e.g. Debian, Scientific or CentOS (both RHEL based)?
Well to be honest I am moderately good with Linux, and no expert. I am also using these servers to get better at Linux, operating them ect.

So I would like a version/release that's popular as in used often by server admins, and isn't a pain in my rear to run.

What would you recommend that works or plays well on the IBM E-server with raid?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27th June 2010, 07:05 AM
CSchwangler Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,535
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: IBM e-server 255 Fedora install?

Quote:
So I would like a version/release that's popular as in used often by server admins, and isn't a pain in my rear to run.
I guess (however, that is disputable) the Linux distros most popular with server admins are (in no particular order)
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
- Debian
- SUSE (not OpenSUSE)

Now, for RHEL and SUSE you have to pay for and only Debian is free. Fortunately, there is CentOS and Scientific Linux, which both are based on RHEL and are free to use. So, if you want to stay in the Red Hat family (to which Fedora also belongs), I would choose either CentOS or Scientific Linux. Scientific is developed by Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN).

http://www.centos.org/
https://www.scientificlinux.org/

Both provide you with long-term support, usually a minimum of three years, and security updates.

The same would be true for Debian, but I am more familiar with Red Hat distros, so I can't say much about Debian.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27th June 2010, 07:43 AM
Thor357 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 9
windows_xp_2003firefox
Re: IBM e-server 255 Fedora install?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSchwangler View Post
I guess (however, that is disputable) the Linux distros most popular with server admins are (in no particular order)
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
- Debian
- SUSE (not OpenSUSE)

Now, for RHEL and SUSE you have to pay for and only Debian is free. Fortunately, there is CentOS and Scientific Linux, which both are based on RHEL and are free to use. So, if you want to stay in the Red Hat family (to which Fedora also belongs), I would choose either CentOS or Scientific Linux. Scientific is developed by Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN).

http://www.centos.org/
https://www.scientificlinux.org/

Both provide you with long-term support, usually a minimum of three years, and security updates.

The same would be true for Debian, but I am more familiar with Red Hat distros, so I can't say much about Debian.


I am grateful for the input you gave. You did guess right, I am more a Red Hat fan.

Thanks again I will look them up.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
255, eserver, fedora, ibm, install

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
install and configure web server with fedora 10 thdinh Fedora Focus 0 17th February 2010 12:38 AM
Fedora 10 - New Install no x server dbeer Installation and Live Media 5 30th November 2008 10:25 PM
Vnc-server won't install on Fedora 4 :( Devil1 Servers & Networking 1 1st December 2007 05:59 PM


Current GMT-time: 20:04 (Tuesday, 21-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat