Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
  #1  
Old 6th July 2010, 10:39 AM
Mikko Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 157
linuxfedorafirefox
In praise of Shotwell

I recently set up a F13 system for my parents, who have been retired for some time and have not used computers at all since their retirement. They had forgotten a shocking amount of stuff (gone from using email to barely being able to find keys on the keyboard). I was dreading a little the handling of photos from their camera and phones, but Shotwell's user interface actually proved to be very easy for them to grasp. Gthumb or any of the other ones would have been a lot harder.

I took a closer look at Shotwell myself and built the new 0.6 version from source. I'd heard about Vala before, but only now realized just what it is. I think it's a great idea to use the C runtime and introduce just a relatively simple compiler and bindings instead of a new VM and an entire runtime. The performance seems to be very snappy (I'm saying this a someone who's been pretty underwhelmed by Mono apps).

I just hope Shotwell 0.6.1 is packaged for F13 soon. There are quite a lot of useful new features.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 6th July 2010, 12:42 PM
Hlingler's Avatar
Hlingler Offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Connellsville, PA, USA
Posts: 11,289
linuxkonqueror
Re: In praise of Shotwell

You could download the F13 shotwell-0.5.2 SRPM and rebuild for F13 using the new 0.6.1 source code (and a few spec-file edits) - it looks like there are no patches to deal with: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/b...buildID=173112

Or file a bug report against shotwell to request an update: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

V
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 6th July 2010, 02:14 PM
Mikko Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 157
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: In praise of Shotwell

I have the latest version for myself, that's not the problem. I assumed that since Shotwell was made the default and since 0.6 is a significant improvement, it would get updated in Fedora 13 without me prodding anyone.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 6th July 2010, 02:21 PM
Hlingler's Avatar
Hlingler Offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Connellsville, PA, USA
Posts: 11,289
linuxkonqueror
Re: In praise of Shotwell

I would not make that assumption.

V
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 6th July 2010, 05:45 PM
Mikko Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 157
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: In praise of Shotwell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hlingler View Post
I would not make that assumption.
The package seems to be on its way. Shotwell 0.6.1 requires libgexiv2 0.1.0 and LibRaw 0.9.1. libgexiv2 is already in Koji. The version is too old, but it's a simple update (replace tarball). LibRaw is not in Fedora yet, but the package review seems to be nearly done:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602279

This is apparently being done specifically to be able to package Shotwell 0.6.1, so it looks like its being done. Building Shotwell itself is also a simple update of the tarball and editing of the dependencies.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13th July 2010, 08:48 AM
Mikko Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 157
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: In praise of Shotwell

Shotwell 0.6.1 is now in Koji. Thanks to Siddhesh Poyarekar for packaging LibRaw and for Matthias Clasen for packaging Shotwell. See

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/b...buildID=183318
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Praise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Melio Using Fedora 2 11th July 2006 02:27 PM


Current GMT-time: 02:40 (Friday, 24-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat