Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
  #1  
Old 29th January 2005, 09:37 AM
drunkahol Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich
Posts: 638
GNOME without KDE (no flamewar intended)

A quick question that may or may not have a quick answer.

I'm building a network install of RHEL3 using TFTP and an FTP server for a client. To investigate this, I'm doing the same at home on a spare PC usign FC3.

The crunch is that the client wants to have a minmum install that has a desktop, so is demanding the GNOME desktop but not the KDE desktop. I'm a GNOME user myself, but there is NO intent here to fan any GNOME vs KDS flamewar - both are excellent desktops in my view.

However, the kickstart install.cfg file that I created with the GUI kickstart editor still installs KDE despite me removing KDE from the install.

A bit further digging shows that the desktop-printing package is installed as part of the GNOME package group, but has a REQUIREMENT that KDE is installed too. desktop-printing is also installed by the KDE desktop package group, but there is no REQUIREMENT for the GNOME desktop.

So I come to an impass. I need to install the GNOME desktop due to clients instructions. But we want all KDE packages excluded. The same dependancy exists in the Fedora Core 3 comps.xml file.

I don't want to install without resolving dependancies (as the Red Hat support guys suggested). And I'd rather install by package group instead of specifying each and every package individually.

Does anyone know how to get round this (without editing the comps.xml file)? Or should I file a bug?

Cheers

Duncan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29th January 2005, 01:10 PM
foolish's Avatar
foolish Offline
Retired Community Manager
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aalesund, Norway
Age: 26
Posts: 1,888
File a bug.

Have you looked into kickstart? In theory you can launch a post install script in kickstart that removes the packages you don't want. It's a bit nasty to install just to remove, but it might work.

See the kickstart documentation for Red Hat 9 (it's the latest available):
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/l...t2-howuse.html
__________________
Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal || http://www.fedorasolved.org || Hardware Profile
- Please adhere to the FedoraForum Guidelines.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29th January 2005, 08:58 PM
drunkahol Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich
Posts: 638
Yes - a bug looks like the way to go. Feels odd to me that no-one has noticed it before with RHEL or Fedora though.

Our %post install script is quite heafty already; installing database products, joining the server to the Active Directory, setting up Kerberos authentication for the users, creating all the necessary users, installing RRDTool for server & database monitoring, building empty databases and restoring backups of last data sets etc etc.

Looks like I'm going to be editing the comps.xml file for now though, as the client wants an install that uses the minimum bandwidth possible. The idea is that we can rebuilt a remote server over the WAN in around an hour! The servers all have HP's Integrated Lights Out, so we can control the console directly via a web browser and boot the machine at will. But installing the KDE packages takes too long over their WAN.

Our %post install script is quite heafty already; installing database products, joining the server to the Active Directory, setting up Kerberos authentication for the users, creating all the necessary users, installing RRDTool for server & database monitoring, building empty databases and restoring backups of last data sets etc etc. Uninstalling it afterwards isn't an option due to the time constraint.

Thanks though.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
flamewar, gnome, intended, kde

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
large numbers of "does not match intended download" failures in yum marko Alpha, Beta & Snapshots Discussions (Fedora 11 Only) 1 18th April 2009 06:19 PM
Bill says you should view the web the way it was intended schwim Wibble 15 12th March 2008 10:26 PM
already have a driver intended for linux for alfa wifi usb jmgc97 Servers & Networking 1 21st January 2008 04:45 AM
Can I dock an app in a DE that the app wasn't intended for? schwim Using Fedora 4 25th September 2007 09:19 PM
Really need some input(no pun intended) about iiimf's b00st Using Fedora 0 25th April 2005 07:04 PM


Current GMT-time: 03:43 (Monday, 20-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat