Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
  #1  
Old 24th June 2005, 06:20 AM
Cruzader's Avatar
Cruzader Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Minnesota, USA
Age: 27
Posts: 73
Question Battery Life

Hi all, I'm in the market for a new laptop. Nothing special, just a portable one to take to classes and drag around. It'll probably be something like:
1.8Ghz
512M-1G mem
40 or more GB HDD
screen probably ~14"
My main concern is getting good battery life (I don't wanna plug it in in class), so this means I'll probably go with a Centrino laptop. I was just wondering if anyone knew of, or had experience with laptops with good battery life (>= 3.5 hrs). Anyone know good brands/models?

Feel free to revise my specs as necessary

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24th June 2005, 01:14 PM
CheezyArmpit Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 94
My laptop is a Mitac AMD64 3200+, with ATI Radeon 9600, and I get around 3 hours with power saving set to anything other than Always-On (in windows - only just put linux on here, shouldn't be too different), not running anything too CPU-intensive, I think most Centrino laptops have battery life in excess of 4 hours.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24th June 2005, 02:09 PM
mellis95 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Texas
Posts: 99
For work I have a Dell D600 and I can get almost 5 hours if I use the second battery. At home I have a Toshiba Satellite A35-S205 and it sucks for battery life. I get about 1 1/2 hours out of it. The Centrino Processor definitely makes a big difference.
__________________
Matt
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24th June 2005, 02:23 PM
Cruzader's Avatar
Cruzader Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Minnesota, USA
Age: 27
Posts: 73
Yeah, I was thinking of going with a Dell, can get em fairly cheap on eBay. Any issues with quality/things just not working in FC?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24th June 2005, 03:06 PM
mellis95 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Texas
Posts: 99
Actually, I forgot to mention that I am running Windows 200 on the Dell (for work) and FC3 on the Toshiba. I would assume that the battery life would be very similar no matter the operating system. I have seen a few posts from people on this forum who are using D series Dell laptops. I would do a search.

[Edit]
Dell's Linux info: http://www1.us.dell.com/content/topi...555&l=en&s=biz
__________________
Matt
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24th June 2005, 04:54 PM
ggulik Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 104
I have a Compaq R3000Z laptop which has a Mobile Athlon processor and I get about 5 hours of battery life with the upgrade battery. The only downside is that laptop is HEAVY. I would seriously consider a Mobile Athlon based processor based on the battery life I'm getting with this unit vs. my other Pentium based laptops.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24th June 2005, 05:43 PM
Cruzader's Avatar
Cruzader Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Minnesota, USA
Age: 27
Posts: 73
Thats pretty good. I'd like to stick with Intel chips however (call me stubborn). I also don't want to have to get either a new battery for it or a secondary battery (weight issues). Might have to get a new battery anyway, though, since in any event I'm gonna be getting the laptop off eBay and if it's used it could not hold much of a charge anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24th June 2005, 06:47 PM
fredjiang Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 38
I would recommend IBM Thinkpad T42/T43. I own two T42s and love them both. Battery life is decent (I can watch one and half DVD movies on one run). So I would say it runs for 3 hours under heavy use (which is pretty good). Did I mention I love the keyboards on these?

One thing to note, unfortunately FC4 (and linux in genearal) does not have the same level of power management as Windows. Running on linux you probably will only get 2/3 of the time of Windows. And standby & hibernation on linux are rather unreliable and require manual tweaking.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 24th June 2005, 07:26 PM
Cruzader's Avatar
Cruzader Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Minnesota, USA
Age: 27
Posts: 73
Thats fine, I don't mind tweaking .confs and such. The 2/3's battery life is why having a laptop with good battery life is important to me. IBM's are usually a bit out of my price range but I'll keep an eye on em (pricerange <= 800).

Thanks
__________________
Registered Linux User #392906
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 24th June 2005, 07:33 PM
rcubed Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 15
On average I think you will see that battery life under linux is less, especially with the stock install. You will have to use laptop-mode as described in the kernel documentation to really take advantage of the power saving features of the laptop. This allows the hard drive to spin down. Next you will need to find a way to slow the CPU down and also Dim the display. These are all avaliable. If you want 3.5 hours you will probably have to get a laptop with a secondary battery. Some models allow the CD to be replaced with a battery.

We happen to sell laptops with all this work done for you, take a look a http://shoprcubed.com/products.asp?cat=15
They are based on ASUS laptops. Sorry for the ad but thought you might want to know.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 24th June 2005, 08:01 PM
Cruzader's Avatar
Cruzader Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Minnesota, USA
Age: 27
Posts: 73
Those look good, but again my pricerange is < 800$. So I've narrowed it to IBM or Dell... thats good. Those IBM's are nice and I'll see if I can't snag one offa eBay for a good price.
__________________
Registered Linux User #392906
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 24th June 2005, 11:16 PM
fredjiang Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 38
If you want IBM you should check if you have any college friends since they can get academic discounts from colleges computer stores.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 26th June 2005, 06:02 PM
Cruzader's Avatar
Cruzader Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Minnesota, USA
Age: 27
Posts: 73
I am a college student, but a good IBM laptop still wouldn't be down into my price range.
__________________
Registered Linux User #392906
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 7th July 2005, 02:38 PM
minimidgy Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by ggulik
I have a Compaq R3000Z laptop which has a Mobile Athlon processor and I get about 5 hours of battery life with the upgrade battery. The only downside is that laptop is HEAVY. I would seriously consider a Mobile Athlon based processor based on the battery life I'm getting with this unit vs. my other Pentium based laptops.
man, maybe I need to get this upgrade. I have that same laptop but mine doesn't even charge all the way. The highest I've ever seen it charged to was 92%. I should probably just drain the battery completely one day and then charge it back up. Even when it is at 92%, I still only get like an hour and a half on it.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 7th July 2005, 05:28 PM
N6546R Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3
I have a T42 running FC4, and with the 'extra-life' battery I see about 5 hours of use. I run cpuspeed to reduce power consumption, other than that it's pretty much stock FC4. The downside of the battery is that it contains extra cells which are packaged in such a way that the battery sticks out from the back of the laptop. I just use it as a handle
ACPI worked with no mods. About the only significant change I've done to the install is to drop in the latest ATI drivers for the Radeon.

Perry



Quote:
Originally Posted by fredjiang
I would recommend IBM Thinkpad T42/T43. I own two T42s and love them both. Battery life is decent (I can watch one and half DVD movies on one run). So I would say it runs for 3 hours under heavy use (which is pretty good). Did I mention I love the keyboards on these?

One thing to note, unfortunately FC4 (and linux in genearal) does not have the same level of power management as Windows. Running on linux you probably will only get 2/3 of the time of Windows. And standby & hibernation on linux are rather unreliable and require manual tweaking.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
battery, life

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Battery life from command line biggsk Hardware & Laptops 2 26th July 2008 12:01 AM
Battery life cut by 1/3 after switching to F8 happydud Hardware & Laptops 7 23rd November 2007 08:44 PM
Battery life mitchell2345 Hardware & Laptops 23 27th January 2007 06:48 PM
Battery Life treak007 Hardware & Laptops 2 29th May 2006 12:14 AM
Battery life using Gnome vs KDE on FC3 and FC4 lafflamj Hardware & Laptops 0 16th June 2005 12:32 AM


Current GMT-time: 14:09 (Sunday, 19-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat